Abbas' Cairo Interview: The Demise of Israel: Hidden in Plain Sigh

12 December 2014


Abbas’ Cairo Interview

The Demise of Israel:  Hidden in Plain Sight

Here are three quotations from the interview given by PLO appointed Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to the Egyptian newspaper ‘Akhbar Al-Yawm’ on 30 November 2014.

“Israel must recognize the June 4, 1967 border”.

 “We cannot recognize a Jewish state”.

 “There are six million refugees who wish to return, and by the way, I am one of them”.

(MEMRI 05 Dec 2014 Special Dispatch5898)


The occasion was the meeting of the Arab League on the previous day in Cairo where the Arab League restated its position as:


“categorical rejection of recognising Israel as a Jewish state”
(Al-Ahram online 29 Nov 2014)


These terms were almost identical to a statement by the 22-member body made earlier in the year when the Council of the Arab League stated that it:


“emphasizes its rejection of recognizing Israel as a ‘Jewish state’ "(Al-Jazeera online 09 Mar 2014)
The same Al- Jazeera article observed that:

“Israel has been pushing to make recognition of Israel as a Jewish state a requirement for peace with the Palestinians”.


Palestinian Rejection

It was in response to Israel’s position that at the end of 2013 Abbas gave a letter to John Kerry, the US Secretary of State. This singled out for attention the continued Palestinian position as:


“refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state”
(Al-Jazeera 13 Dec 2013)
None of this is new or exceptional. It is the standard, rock-solid basic Palestinian position constantly reiterated without deviation in Palestinian political discourse, the media, educational system and mosques. In fact, the idea of accepting Israel as a Jewish state is contemptuously dismissed.  As Abbas remarked:

"What is the 'Jewish state'? We call it the 'State of Israel'. You can call yourselves whatever you want, but I will not accept it. I say this on live broadcast". 

(Palestinian TV 27 April 2009, Palwatch.org)


Likewise, prior to the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations General Assembly in 2011, he said simply:

"We refuse to recognize a Jewish state"
(Palestinian TV 02 June 2011, Memri clip 2959)

It was on this basis that the Palestinian delegation at the General Assembly refused to agree to the formula of 2 states for 2 peoples. This had been proposed by the Quartet in an effort to restart negotiations by softening the issue with the omission of Israel as a Jewish state.

Further, in the aftermath of the UNGA, Abbas informed Egyptian TV:

"I've said it before and I'll say it again: I will never recognize the Jewishness of the state, or a Jewish state".
(23 October 2011, Memri clip 3163)


Read More

Loading the Legal Dice against Israel (1)

Loading the Legal Dice against Israel (1)

Introduction

Legally framed attacks on Israel by critics and enemies flood the world’s media with propaganda hostile to Israel. Claims that the West Bank is “occupied Palestinian territory” and that Jewish settlements are “illegal under international law” are repeated so often that they are widely and uncritically accepted as established truth.


A ‘key feature’ of these accusations is that they are conducted in a very peculiar way that does a great deal of damage to Israel. The dice are loaded against Israel by two major deceptions.

The first deception is that the allegations rely entirely on unresolved legal interpretations of international law. Yet these are misrepresented to appear as if they were settled legal certainties when they are not. Indeed, had there been legal rulings against Israel on these issues, we can be sure that they would have been widely publicized and incessantly quoted. 

This subterfuge by Israel’s enemies to pass-off undecided legal claims as established legal facts has been highly successful in enlisting widespread but unwarranted public and political support against Israel and its legitimacy.

This is the subject matter of this post. 

The second deception loads the dice against Israel by ignoring established legal agreements. That is, legal decisions that do exist are brushed aside and primacy is given to speculation where decisions do not exist. 

Knowledge of existing legal agreements is normally considered an entirely reasonable, necessary and inevitable part of any competent and honest legal evaluation. In this case, it would also considerably strengthen Israel’s legal reputation.


Read more ...


B’tselem and the Martians Part 2

B’tselem and the Martians (2)

The Gaza War and Hamas


In Part 1 it was suggested that whereas the Martians were only able to see one of the parties to a conflict due to an equipment malfunction, B’tselem has no such excuse.  Its failure to see is a product of downplaying or ignoring what it prefers not to see.

As an illustration of this, Part 1 noted that the B’tselem website covers the conflict in Gaza with only a single article devoted to Hamas out of 15 front-page articles (on 11 August 2014).  This briefly comments that the Hamas practice of firing rockets from civilian areas in Gaza into civilian areas in Israel is ”morally and legally reprehensible” – but apparently this is not illegal or criminal for B’tselem.  

Given the unrelenting blame heaped upon Israel by B’tselem elsewhere on its website with a variety of accusations of criminal activity, it is hard to view this mild rebuke as other than a mere token.   Presumably, its inclusion is intended to provide at least some appearance of 'balance' in its criticism.      

How else to explain that nowhere in the article, or elsewhere in its coverage of the war, or elsewhere on the B’tselem website, is there any mention that Hamas is a murderous anti-Semitic terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the slaughter of as many Jews as possible?     

Typically, this is also absent from the coverage of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict by the mainstream mass media.   But why would B’tselem want to hide it?   Is it such an irrelevance that it can be ignored?   Or is it information critical to understanding the conflict?   

B’tselem and the Martians Part 1

14 August  2014

B’tselem and the Martians (1)

The Gaza War and Hamas

Shortly after writing the previous blog entry (How Many Civilian Casualties in Gaza?) a link to the website of B’tselem arrived from a friend.   This devotes many articles to the damage and casualties in Gaza.   Possibly, the sender meant them as an antidote to my article.   Instead, it reminded me of a story I heard many years ago.

This was not long after the BBC’s monopoly of British television was broken by ITV.   One of the innovations of ITV was the introduction of wrestling into sports programs.   Much of this was the sham, entertainment-type of wrestling - far too vulgar for the BBC.   

One day, as the wrestling was being shown; earth was visited by beings from space – almost certainly Martians.   While circling the earth, their receivers somehow picked up the wrestling transmissions.  

Unfortunately, these suffered a serious malfunction – and only one of the wrestlers was visible.   The Martians watched as the lone wrestler repeatedly smashed his head against the corner post, screamed in agony, twisted his arms behind his back, contorted his face in pain, bounced off the ropes, rose into the air and crashed to the floor in an unconscious heap.


Disturbed by this alarming display, the Martians could see no rational explanation and concluded that the earthlings were mad.  Curiosity satisfied, they reversed direction and headed back into space never to return.   

Read more

How Many Civilian Casualties in Gaza?

24 July 2014

How Many Civilian Casualties in Gaza?
At the time of writing, it is reported that over 800 civilians in Gaza have been killed in the current conflict with Israel. But is this true? Where did these figures come from? Are they reliable? 

The short answer is that the figures come from Hamas and they are not reliable. They have been deliberately distorted. This is how.

In the first place, a directive from the Hamas Interior Ministry instructed spokesmen to report that ALL casualties are civilian. Further, they are instructed not to show pictures of rockets being fired from civilian areas. This can easily be confirmed by reference to the stalwart translation work of Memri.org. 

Secondly, from Hamas sources Al-Jazeera has compiled a list of what it says are civilians killed. This shows that male deaths were over 80% of the total. Even more indicative, those men between the ages of 18 and 38 were over 65% of the total. This means that deaths among men of fighting age are disproportionately high. 

Thirdly, the policy of Hamas to use civilians as human shields has contributed .... 


Mazal Tov President Abbas Part 2

22 January 2012

Mazal Tov, President Abbas (Part 2)

Lenin, Abbas and the UK Deputy Prime Minister



Lenin is credited with having coined the expression 'useful idiots'. By this is meant the service provided by innocent and ideologically blinded western politicians and reporters who defended the young Soviet state and did their best to deny, excuse or shield its totalitarian savagery from exposure.

In other words, the useful idiots served a totalitarian, anti-democratic and anti-liberal purpose. In reality, by defending revolutionary totalitarianism instead of supporting the democrats and liberals, who were being wiped-out by Lenin, Trotsky, Bukharin and Stalin, they became dangerous idiots.

To look at this from another angle, the only people who are fooled by useful idiots are the liberal democrats who fail to see that their own liberal-democratic way of thinking and behaving is far from being shared by everyone. The liberal-democratic view that thinks disputes should be settled on a win-win basis without violence is fine when dealing with others who share a similar outlook. When reinforced by well-established and agreed structures, limits and laws the advantages seem obvious...


Mazal Tov, President Abbas (Part 1)

21 January 2012

Mazal Tov, President Abbas (Part 1)

Solidarity with the Palestiniansx


Earlier this month, a momentous occasion passed for the President of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas - he began the eighth year of his four-year term as President. But instead of a tsunami of congratulations from the world's leaders for this popular figure on such a remarkable anniversary, the occasion has been almost universally ignored.

The absence of elections for the Presidency is not the only feature of Palestinian democracy to be ignored by large sections of the world's political leaders and media. They have also ignored repeated cancellations of the Palestinian local elections. Likewise, the disappearance of elections to the Palestinian Authority has been greeted by silence. This is not an oversight. There is a pattern and the pattern is clear. 

The Palestinian leaders, in both Gaza and the Disputed Territories, jettison democracy ... 

Tzipi Livni: Inept or Dangerous?

26 Oct 2011

Tzipi Livni: Inept or Dangerous?

Misrepresenting Israel Abroad

Tzipi Livni is currently leader of Kadima ('forward') the largest opposition party in the Knesset. But if the remarks made by her deputy Shaul Mofaz at his recent Sukkot party are anything to go by (he announced that he would be the next Prime Minister of Israel), she won't be in this top position long. In a sense, this would be a pity. There is something comically entertaining in observing the constant stream of back-biting, incompetence, personal animosity and wishful-thinking at work. 

Of course, this faint enjoyment would be spoiled entirely if these people ever came to power. But working on the assumption that Mofaz is as deluded as his leader, we may be forced to suffer her as boss of Kadima for some time yet. So we may as well make the most of the entertainment value of her speciality: sounding like a petulant, spoilt child in a constant sulk.

Unfortunately, we cannot rely on this...   

The New Egypt and the Clash of Civilizations

22 February 2011

The New Egypt and the Clash of Civilizations

More Lessons of History


In 1973, the leaders of Egypt learned two critical lessons from the October 'Yom Kippur' War. The first was that it took a truly enormous effort to make even limited military gains against Israel. As part of its preparation for the assault, Egypt devoted a huge proportion of its GNP to the military. Military spending rose from 13% of GNP in 1969 to 25% by 1973.

Employing advanced Soviet bridging techniques, an extremely enterprising technique to blast tank pathways through Israeli sand-barriers and a huge supply of sophisticated Soviet weaponry, the much admired assault by Egyptian forces was a tremendous success in crossing the canal and pushing back Israeli defences. Yet even with the advantage of a powerful opening attack and almost total surprise, the attack failed to completely achieve its modest aim of seizing two Israeli military roads running parallel to the canal a mere 30 kilometres (20 miles) inside the Sinai....


Read more

The Fantasy of a Demilitarised Palestinian State

14 June 2010


The Fantasy of a Demilitarized Palestinian State

The Critical Security Needs of Israel for a Viable Peace


As Prime Minister Netanyahu demonstrated in his speech at Bar Ilan University exactly a year ago, at last we have a leader who makes a central diplomatic issue of the central Israeli requirement for peace with the Palestinians. This is that if the 2-State Solution is to be the solution in reality it is proclaimed to be in theory, the Palestinians must accept Israel as a Jewish state.

The reason for this demand is simple. Without the acceptance of Israel as a Jewish state there can be no confidence that '2-State Solution' will end the conflict as its promoters believe or pretend to believe. Instead, it will only be a new stage in the war against Israel. Therefore, the incessant repetition of the demand for acceptance of Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state is needed to expose its serial rejection by the Palestinians for as long as they refuse to accept it. 

Further, with sufficient repetition and constant promotion, the fact that it is impossible to solve the conflict on the basis of a 2-state solution without this Palestinian acceptance will make it possible for Israel to attract far wider public and diplomatic support. Otherwise, Israel's position is widely seen as illegitimate with the result that it is perpetually on the diplomatic defensive....